About CT Lien Solutions

Lenders and law firms across the country look to CT Lien Solutions to secure and monitor positions. Connected to every jurisdiction in the nation, we provide quick, accurate and comprehensive due diligence and risk management services—to help our clients achieve perfection.


Email us at CTLSblog@ctliensolutions.com

Subscribe to CTLS Communications
Follow CTLienSolutions on Twitter

« UCC Article 9 Roundtable - Los Angeles | Main | April jurisdictional holidays »

March 24, 2011


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

CT Lien Solutions - Amanda Rasizzi

Hi Maria. The continuation is valid as long as the secured party had authority to file the continuation. Most likely, the authority to file the continuation survived the merger, in which case the continuation would be valid. The fact that the name changed isn't an issue, as the name of the secured party isn't held to the same "seriously misleading" standards that a debtor name is held.

Maria Kotsiovos

Is a continuation deemed invalid if the secured party name used to continue the filing was changed do to merger without filing an amendment first? If the language used was as an example, ABC Company successor to DEF Company as trustee.

The comments to this entry are closed.